On October 31, 1984, Bjoerkner, Bert published an article.Quality Control of 2,2-Dimethylpropane-1,3-diyl bis(2-methylacrylate) The title of the article was The sensitizing capacity of multifunctional acrylates in the guinea pig. And the article contained the following:
The sensitizing capacity of multifunctional acrylates and their cross-reactivity patterns were investigated with the guinea pig maximization test. 1,4-Butanediol diacrylate [1070-70-8] and 1,6-hexanediol diacrylate [13048-33-4] were moderate to strong sensitizers and they probably cross-react with each other. The n-ethylene glycol diacrylates and methacrylates tested were weak and nonsensitizers. Tripropylene glycol diacrylate [94120-00-0] was a moderate and neopentyl glycol diacrylate [2223-82-7] a strong sensitizer, whereas neopentyl glycol dimethacrylate [1985-51-9] was a nonsensitizer. The com. PETA is a mixture of pentaerythritol tri- [3524-68-3] and tetraacrylate [4986-89-4] (PETA 3 and PETA 4, resp.). PETA 3 is a much stronger sensitizer than PETA 4. Simultaneous reactions were seen between PETA 3, PETA 4 and trimethylolpropane triacrylate (TMPTA) [15625-89-5]. The oligotriacrylate [101661-95-4] is a moderate sensitizer, but no concomitant reactions were seen with PETA 3, PETA 4 or TMPTA. Of multifunctional acrylates tested, the di- and triacrylic compounds, should be regarded as potent sensitizers. The methacrylate multifunctional acrylic compounds were weak or nonsensitizers. The experimental process involved the reaction of 2,2-Dimethylpropane-1,3-diyl bis(2-methylacrylate)(cas: 1985-51-9).Quality Control of 2,2-Dimethylpropane-1,3-diyl bis(2-methylacrylate)
The Article related to acrylate sensitization, Toxicology: Chemicals (Household, Industrial, General) and other aspects.Quality Control of 2,2-Dimethylpropane-1,3-diyl bis(2-methylacrylate)
Referemce:
Ester – Wikipedia,
Ester – an overview | ScienceDirect Topics